Skip to content
Private Catalyst
Method note

We build it in production. Then we hand it over.

No discovery phase that produces a slide deck, and no phase five.

Applies to
Fixed-fee engagements
Your time
A handful of interviews, then one engineer part-time
Exit
Agreed in writing before we start

Map

We interview the teams already using AI, whether or not that was sanctioned, and read the proxy and DLP logs with your security people. That tells us which workflows are worth automating and which data is involved.

Workload and sensitivity mapThe workflows worth automatingBuild-versus-buy call

Size

Hardware is sized against real concurrency and context length rather than a vendor's reference architecture. Three or four open-weight candidates are benchmarked on your tasks, at the quantisation you would actually run.

Sizing memo, two optionsModel bake-off resultsThree-year cost modelNetwork and SSO design

Build

One workflow someone performs daily, shipped properly: retrieval over your own documents, the automation that acts on the output, logging, rate limits and an evaluation set your experts graded. We pick the boring, frequent job over the one that demonstrates well.

A system in productionAutomation into your systems of recordEvaluations in CIAn audit trail compliance accepts

Hand over

We pull a GPU node, expire a certificate and corrupt an index on purpose. Your engineers fix all three while we sit behind them. Anything they cannot fix yet becomes a documented gap with an owner and a date.

Runbook and on-call rotaTwo sessions, recordedDrill resultsModel refresh calendar

What you keep

Sizing memo

Two hardware options, arithmetic shown, so your engineers can check it.

Cost model

Three years against your current API spend. A spreadsheet, not a slide.

Golden set

Work your own experts graded. It outlives us and the model.

Runbook and drill

The manual, and a recording of your team recovering from a failure we caused.

Fixed, and what moves it

Fixed fee

Quoted against a written scope. Misjudging the effort is our problem, not a change request.

What moves it

Air-gapped sites, more than one data domain, an identity estate mid-migration, regulator evidence.

Never billed

Scoping calls, your security questionnaire, travel in [REGION], or telling you not to hire us yet.

Terms

[X]% on signature, balance on delivery, [NET] days. You contract hardware directly, at your prices.

ScopeReadinessA fixed assessmentPilotOne workflow, in productionPlatformA platform and a rota
Best whenReadinessYou need numbers for a board or a CISOPilotOne workflow is blocked by data rulesPlatformSeveral teams want in and nobody owns it
HardwareReadinessNonePilotYours, or rented single-tenantPlatformYours
FeeReadiness[YOUR PRICE] fixedPilotFrom [YOUR PRICE]Platform[YOUR PRICE] per month

Asked on every first call

Open weights vs frontier

Behind on hard reasoning. Level on the summarising, extracting and drafting that is most internal work.

How much hardware

Less than most quotes assume. A department often runs on one multi-GPU box. See the sizing table.

Air-gapped sites

Yes. Models and updates arrive on physical media with checksums. Slower build, longer runbook.

Is private cloud enough

Usually. A single-tenant VPC satisfies most clauses; some programmes need the machines in your building.

Who runs it after

Your platform team, with tools they already use. No such team? Say so early and we will tell you to wait.

Is this just a chatbot

Rarely. Most of the value is automation: intake, extraction, routing and writes into the systems you already run, with an approval gate.

Will you sign our NDA

Yes, before the first real conversation. Security posture and insurance certificate on request.

Start here

Send us the workload that cannot leave your network.

Fixed fee, and you keep the memo either way.